<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Autonomy buys Interwoven</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jasonplant.co.uk/2009/01/autonomy-buys-interwoven/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jasonplant.co.uk/2009/01/autonomy-buys-interwoven/</link>
	<description>A law blog written by someone from IT or an IT blog written by someone who works for a law firm</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 13:34:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Fermant</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonplant.co.uk/2009/01/autonomy-buys-interwoven/comment-page-1/#comment-1648</link>
		<dc:creator>John Fermant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 14:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonplant.co.uk/2009/01/autonomy-buys-interwoven/#comment-1648</guid>
		<description>I could not see one search vendor using anothers technology in one of their products, irrespective of the level of commitment. Having seen Auotnomy&#039;s offerings its rare they ever use third party offerings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could not see one search vendor using anothers technology in one of their products, irrespective of the level of commitment. Having seen Auotnomy&#8217;s offerings its rare they ever use third party offerings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonplant.co.uk/2009/01/autonomy-buys-interwoven/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 00:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonplant.co.uk/2009/01/autonomy-buys-interwoven/#comment-20</guid>
		<description>I think this is v interesting. I don&#039;t see how Velocity can be sidelined. At a recent product roadmap demo I saw, Velocity was going to replace ALL search in ALL Interwoven products, the WCM products too. I think there&#039;s been too much commitment to making Velocity work, and too much good feedback from the client base for Autonomy (or Verity...) to be considered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is v interesting. I don&#8217;t see how Velocity can be sidelined. At a recent product roadmap demo I saw, Velocity was going to replace ALL search in ALL Interwoven products, the WCM products too. I think there&#8217;s been too much commitment to making Velocity work, and too much good feedback from the client base for Autonomy (or Verity&#8230;) to be considered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonplant.co.uk/2009/01/autonomy-buys-interwoven/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 13:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonplant.co.uk/2009/01/autonomy-buys-interwoven/#comment-19</guid>
		<description>Perhaps I ought to edit the post!!

Another interesting peice is Autonomy bought Verity in 2005 which was the original pre WorkSite 8.3 indexer.

Back to Verity with 8.5 then?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps I ought to edit the post!!</p>
<p>Another interesting peice is Autonomy bought Verity in 2005 which was the original pre WorkSite 8.3 indexer.</p>
<p>Back to Verity with 8.5 then?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonplant.co.uk/2009/01/autonomy-buys-interwoven/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 12:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonplant.co.uk/2009/01/autonomy-buys-interwoven/#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Actually reading some of the press release (http://is.gd/gOMt) in more detail makes me think this could be good for legal.

e.g. some quotes from it: 
&quot;The Acquisition will strengthen Autonomy&#039;s access to the worldwide legal and compliance industry through Interwoven&#039;s significant sales force with industry expertise&quot;

&quot;Interwoven Company Highlights: De facto standard for Legal Document Management&quot;

&quot;The combination of the two companies will redefine how global 2000 corporations, leading law firms...&quot; 

&quot;customers already in place, including Bank of America, Bayer, Deutsche Bank, DLA Piper, Shell, Tesco and White &amp; Case.&quot;

That&#039;s a lot of comment on what you could consider a small vertical market. So maybe the legal market will get a lot more of the new companies focus?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually reading some of the press release (<a href="http://is.gd/gOMt" rel="nofollow">http://is.gd/gOMt</a>) in more detail makes me think this could be good for legal.</p>
<p>e.g. some quotes from it:<br />
&#8220;The Acquisition will strengthen Autonomy&#8217;s access to the worldwide legal and compliance industry through Interwoven&#8217;s significant sales force with industry expertise&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Interwoven Company Highlights: De facto standard for Legal Document Management&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;The combination of the two companies will redefine how global 2000 corporations, leading law firms&#8230;&#8221; </p>
<p>&#8220;customers already in place, including Bank of America, Bayer, Deutsche Bank, DLA Piper, Shell, Tesco and White &#038; Case.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a lot of comment on what you could consider a small vertical market. So maybe the legal market will get a lot more of the new companies focus?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

