<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lawyers need to understand the web and media (aka web 2.0 and new media)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jasonplant.co.uk/2009/10/lawyers-need-to-understand-the-web-and-media-aka-web-2-0-and-new-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jasonplant.co.uk/2009/10/lawyers-need-to-understand-the-web-and-media-aka-web-2-0-and-new-media/</link>
	<description>A law blog written by someone from IT or an IT blog written by someone who works for a law firm</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 13:34:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oh No! Not another Rage against the Machine-Joe McElderry post! &#124; No option for Law Firm</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonplant.co.uk/2009/10/lawyers-need-to-understand-the-web-and-media-aka-web-2-0-and-new-media/comment-page-1/#comment-4281</link>
		<dc:creator>Oh No! Not another Rage against the Machine-Joe McElderry post! &#124; No option for Law Firm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 21:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonplant.co.uk/?p=352#comment-4281</guid>
		<description>[...] get us all go web 2.0 and set up internal facebook systems. No, this is simply to raise awareness. As I&#8217;ve mentioned before Legal IT&#8217;ers need to be educating their lawyers (and perhaps some of their colleagues) about [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] get us all go web 2.0 and set up internal facebook systems. No, this is simply to raise awareness. As I&#8217;ve mentioned before Legal IT&#8217;ers need to be educating their lawyers (and perhaps some of their colleagues) about [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonplant.co.uk/2009/10/lawyers-need-to-understand-the-web-and-media-aka-web-2-0-and-new-media/comment-page-1/#comment-3588</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 20:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonplant.co.uk/?p=352#comment-3588</guid>
		<description>The above You Tube link isn&#039;t spam, it&#039;s a pretty good video on web 2.0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The above You Tube link isn&#8217;t spam, it&#8217;s a pretty good video on web 2.0</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Artis</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonplant.co.uk/2009/10/lawyers-need-to-understand-the-web-and-media-aka-web-2-0-and-new-media/comment-page-1/#comment-3576</link>
		<dc:creator>Artis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 03:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonplant.co.uk/?p=352#comment-3576</guid>
		<description>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6gmP4nk0EOE</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6gmP4nk0EOE" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6gmP4nk0EOE</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daryl</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonplant.co.uk/2009/10/lawyers-need-to-understand-the-web-and-media-aka-web-2-0-and-new-media/comment-page-1/#comment-3502</link>
		<dc:creator>Daryl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 11:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonplant.co.uk/?p=352#comment-3502</guid>
		<description>I agree that alot of the terminology in use is beginning to appear a bit dated. Some tech bloggers are already referring to &quot;Web 3.0&quot;.
However, the terms are useful hooks onto which to hook a discussion, but I doubt that they mean anything whatsover to your average lawyer. 

What to replace them with though? Is there a danger of further dumbing down (God help us - please no!!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that alot of the terminology in use is beginning to appear a bit dated. Some tech bloggers are already referring to &#8220;Web 3.0&#8243;.<br />
However, the terms are useful hooks onto which to hook a discussion, but I doubt that they mean anything whatsover to your average lawyer. </p>
<p>What to replace them with though? Is there a danger of further dumbing down (God help us &#8211; please no!!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peninsulawyer</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonplant.co.uk/2009/10/lawyers-need-to-understand-the-web-and-media-aka-web-2-0-and-new-media/comment-page-1/#comment-3493</link>
		<dc:creator>Peninsulawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 21:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonplant.co.uk/?p=352#comment-3493</guid>
		<description>I am always amazed by how many lawyers will happily write about Twitter and social networking whilst clearly having no first hand experience themselves. I agree that there is no reason to expect all lawyers to Tweet, but like anything else I would expect to have at least a working knowledge before claiming to understand (or dismiss) it!

I agree too that they key is knowing which communication tools to use for what. A lot of people still haven&#039;t really mastered this for email to be honest… great tool for lots of things, but terrible for the kind of tricky, contentious conversations that it is tempting to use it for (presumably because it avoids having the awkward conversation face to face!). 

On the subject of web 2.0 - why is it the only thing which seems to leap whole versions? What happened to web 1.6?

I do think that a lot of the terminology floating around could use a second look. Social networking? Is there any other kind? Just need to think of something better to describe it…</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am always amazed by how many lawyers will happily write about Twitter and social networking whilst clearly having no first hand experience themselves. I agree that there is no reason to expect all lawyers to Tweet, but like anything else I would expect to have at least a working knowledge before claiming to understand (or dismiss) it!</p>
<p>I agree too that they key is knowing which communication tools to use for what. A lot of people still haven&#8217;t really mastered this for email to be honest… great tool for lots of things, but terrible for the kind of tricky, contentious conversations that it is tempting to use it for (presumably because it avoids having the awkward conversation face to face!). </p>
<p>On the subject of web 2.0 &#8211; why is it the only thing which seems to leap whole versions? What happened to web 1.6?</p>
<p>I do think that a lot of the terminology floating around could use a second look. Social networking? Is there any other kind? Just need to think of something better to describe it…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

