<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple iPad &#8211; a disappointment for legal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jasonplant.co.uk/2010/01/apple-ipad-a-disappointment-for-legal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jasonplant.co.uk/2010/01/apple-ipad-a-disappointment-for-legal/</link>
	<description>A law blog written by someone from IT or an IT blog written by someone who works for a law firm</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 03:57:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Temple Colli</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonplant.co.uk/2010/01/apple-ipad-a-disappointment-for-legal/comment-page-1/#comment-8085</link>
		<dc:creator>Temple Colli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 18:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonplant.co.uk/2010/01/apple-ipad-a-disappointment-for-legal/#comment-8085</guid>
		<description>The affect this product will have on the electronic world is big. It will give us a slightly bigger excuse to waste time messing around on the net. I would be influenced to buy the iPad if it cleaned up my room and did my washing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The affect this product will have on the electronic world is big. It will give us a slightly bigger excuse to waste time messing around on the net. I would be influenced to buy the iPad if it cleaned up my room and did my washing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toronto Law</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonplant.co.uk/2010/01/apple-ipad-a-disappointment-for-legal/comment-page-1/#comment-7975</link>
		<dc:creator>Toronto Law</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jun 2010 02:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonplant.co.uk/2010/01/apple-ipad-a-disappointment-for-legal/#comment-7975</guid>
		<description>A fantastic Attorney should dedicate their company in providing professional legal services to individuals and businesses coming from all sizes as well in a wide array of areas. Ensuring the firm covers  a broad range of cases involving all levels of complexity is vital to legal success.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A fantastic Attorney should dedicate their company in providing professional legal services to individuals and businesses coming from all sizes as well in a wide array of areas. Ensuring the firm covers  a broad range of cases involving all levels of complexity is vital to legal success.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bram Braakman</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonplant.co.uk/2010/01/apple-ipad-a-disappointment-for-legal/comment-page-1/#comment-6340</link>
		<dc:creator>Bram Braakman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 19:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonplant.co.uk/2010/01/apple-ipad-a-disappointment-for-legal/#comment-6340</guid>
		<description>Hi Jason, I do not agree with your skepticism about the iPad but understand your points. Usage within law firms might take a few years to get started (seriously). For smaller (especially single-person) practices the iPad will be embraced a useful tool for anyone who likes digital tools (most lawyers actually do not).

Here are more of my thoughts on it:
http://www.legalitblog.com/comments/apple_ipad_will_be_coming_to_a_law_firm_near_you_soon_enough/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jason, I do not agree with your skepticism about the iPad but understand your points. Usage within law firms might take a few years to get started (seriously). For smaller (especially single-person) practices the iPad will be embraced a useful tool for anyone who likes digital tools (most lawyers actually do not).</p>
<p>Here are more of my thoughts on it:<br />
<a href="http://www.legalitblog.com/comments/apple_ipad_will_be_coming_to_a_law_firm_near_you_soon_enough/" rel="nofollow">http://www.legalitblog.com/comments/apple_ipad_will_be_coming_to_a_law_firm_near_you_soon_enough/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonplant.co.uk/2010/01/apple-ipad-a-disappointment-for-legal/comment-page-1/#comment-5816</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 20:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonplant.co.uk/2010/01/apple-ipad-a-disappointment-for-legal/#comment-5816</guid>
		<description>I agree with you that there is not room between a &quot;netbook&quot; and a smartphone for a major product category.

I believe that iPad is a defensive move by Apple.  It sees lightweight notebook computers with &quot;CULV&quot; processors cutting into the market for netbooks and then eliminating the need for separate tablet computers, like the iPad.

This will be driven by performance/price/power improvements in processors and price improvements in solid state disks.

What will happen when the equivalent of today&#039;s top end MacBook Air (with solid state disk) is priced where a low end notebook computer or high end netbook is today?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you that there is not room between a &#8220;netbook&#8221; and a smartphone for a major product category.</p>
<p>I believe that iPad is a defensive move by Apple.  It sees lightweight notebook computers with &#8220;CULV&#8221; processors cutting into the market for netbooks and then eliminating the need for separate tablet computers, like the iPad.</p>
<p>This will be driven by performance/price/power improvements in processors and price improvements in solid state disks.</p>
<p>What will happen when the equivalent of today&#8217;s top end MacBook Air (with solid state disk) is priced where a low end notebook computer or high end netbook is today?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dataprivacyguru</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonplant.co.uk/2010/01/apple-ipad-a-disappointment-for-legal/comment-page-1/#comment-5723</link>
		<dc:creator>Dataprivacyguru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 21:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonplant.co.uk/2010/01/apple-ipad-a-disappointment-for-legal/#comment-5723</guid>
		<description>What about the security/privacy issues?

How is it set up to do encryption?

Are the communication sessions protected?

What about losing your ipad with client data on it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about the security/privacy issues?</p>
<p>How is it set up to do encryption?</p>
<p>Are the communication sessions protected?</p>
<p>What about losing your ipad with client data on it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Giles</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonplant.co.uk/2010/01/apple-ipad-a-disappointment-for-legal/comment-page-1/#comment-5702</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Giles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 03:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonplant.co.uk/2010/01/apple-ipad-a-disappointment-for-legal/#comment-5702</guid>
		<description>I think Multitasking is not as much of an issue. All the application vendors need to realise this is a device we need to work with. We will write a special approval application for the iPad for our OpenPurchase application. It will need to open and close so quickly that you will not need to multi-task as you can only do one thing at a time! Ah sorry does that apply to attorneys?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Multitasking is not as much of an issue. All the application vendors need to realise this is a device we need to work with. We will write a special approval application for the iPad for our OpenPurchase application. It will need to open and close so quickly that you will not need to multi-task as you can only do one thing at a time! Ah sorry does that apply to attorneys?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cosma</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonplant.co.uk/2010/01/apple-ipad-a-disappointment-for-legal/comment-page-1/#comment-5578</link>
		<dc:creator>Cosma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 10:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonplant.co.uk/2010/01/apple-ipad-a-disappointment-for-legal/#comment-5578</guid>
		<description>Right with you on this one.  Nice toy, but what&#039;s it for?

I am stunned by some of the reviews that I am reading that sing the praises.  Sure it looks cool.  Sure it may be a nice book reader.  But other than carrying a library with you....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right with you on this one.  Nice toy, but what&#8217;s it for?</p>
<p>I am stunned by some of the reviews that I am reading that sing the praises.  Sure it looks cool.  Sure it may be a nice book reader.  But other than carrying a library with you&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kipper</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonplant.co.uk/2010/01/apple-ipad-a-disappointment-for-legal/comment-page-1/#comment-5246</link>
		<dc:creator>Kipper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 08:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonplant.co.uk/2010/01/apple-ipad-a-disappointment-for-legal/#comment-5246</guid>
		<description>Hmmm, I&#039;m not so sure.  The lack of multitasking can be a pain, but it does lead to a much more stable environment.  If a lawyer can check his email, review a document from the DMS or show a presentation on the move, with a tablet thats very likely to be working, then use an app to fire up a virtual machine with all the facilities of the office desktop, then they can really work well on the move, and more effectively guarantee a minimum level of functionality, while allowing the exact same environment as an office desktop if necessary.  It could be perfect for laywers on the move, though you&#039;d have to be creative in your approach.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm, I&#8217;m not so sure.  The lack of multitasking can be a pain, but it does lead to a much more stable environment.  If a lawyer can check his email, review a document from the DMS or show a presentation on the move, with a tablet thats very likely to be working, then use an app to fire up a virtual machine with all the facilities of the office desktop, then they can really work well on the move, and more effectively guarantee a minimum level of functionality, while allowing the exact same environment as an office desktop if necessary.  It could be perfect for laywers on the move, though you&#8217;d have to be creative in your approach.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peninsulawyer</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonplant.co.uk/2010/01/apple-ipad-a-disappointment-for-legal/comment-page-1/#comment-5035</link>
		<dc:creator>Peninsulawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 10:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonplant.co.uk/2010/01/apple-ipad-a-disappointment-for-legal/#comment-5035</guid>
		<description>Jason - totally agree on the lack of multi-tasking.

It doesn&#039;t really bother me on the iPhone, but on a device like this I would want to be able to cut and paste from/to emails into Word, keep an eye on Twitter etc. without having to keep hitting the home button.

I don&#039;t know about handwriting recognition and a stylus - personally I probably prefer typing on a decent keyboard. What I think would make this the killer device for lawyers is a better way to review, markup and edit documents. Maybe this could use multi-touch for selecting, moving and highlighting text and flicking quickly and easily between pages, but with notes and annotations via a keyboard (or stylus if you prefer!).

Interested to see what they look like in the flesh, but at the moment for mobile working I agree with you that I would spend my money on a netbook.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason &#8211; totally agree on the lack of multi-tasking.</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t really bother me on the iPhone, but on a device like this I would want to be able to cut and paste from/to emails into Word, keep an eye on Twitter etc. without having to keep hitting the home button.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know about handwriting recognition and a stylus &#8211; personally I probably prefer typing on a decent keyboard. What I think would make this the killer device for lawyers is a better way to review, markup and edit documents. Maybe this could use multi-touch for selecting, moving and highlighting text and flicking quickly and easily between pages, but with notes and annotations via a keyboard (or stylus if you prefer!).</p>
<p>Interested to see what they look like in the flesh, but at the moment for mobile working I agree with you that I would spend my money on a netbook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victor Medina</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonplant.co.uk/2010/01/apple-ipad-a-disappointment-for-legal/comment-page-1/#comment-5025</link>
		<dc:creator>Victor Medina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 22:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonplant.co.uk/2010/01/apple-ipad-a-disappointment-for-legal/#comment-5025</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve also posted in favor of using the iPad in a legal context.  

http://www.maclovinjd.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve also posted in favor of using the iPad in a legal context.  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.maclovinjd.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.maclovinjd.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
