<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Outlook 2010 &#8211; a legal viewpoint &#8211; part 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jasonplant.co.uk/2010/07/outlook-2010-a-legal-viewpoint-part-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jasonplant.co.uk/2010/07/outlook-2010-a-legal-viewpoint-part-1/</link>
	<description>A law blog written by someone from IT or an IT blog written by someone who works for a law firm</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 13:34:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Outlook 2010 &#8211; a legal viewpoint &#8211; part 3 &#124; No option for Law Firm</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonplant.co.uk/2010/07/outlook-2010-a-legal-viewpoint-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-18538</link>
		<dc:creator>Outlook 2010 &#8211; a legal viewpoint &#8211; part 3 &#124; No option for Law Firm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 20:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonplant.co.uk/?p=552#comment-18538</guid>
		<description>[...] months since I last blogged about my thoughts on Outlook 2010. You can read my previous two posts here and here (and on the Legal IT Professionals site, here and here) or you can just use the Office [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] months since I last blogged about my thoughts on Outlook 2010. You can read my previous two posts here and here (and on the Legal IT Professionals site, here and here) or you can just use the Office [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

