Tag Archives: office

Google Cloud Connect for Microsoft Office

Here’s one to strike fear into every risk manager in law firms and perhaps give a warm glow to every lawyer (well the tech savvy ones at least), Google Cloud Connect!

In Google’s words.

Google Cloud Connect for Microsoft Office brings collaborative multi-person editing to the familiar Microsoft® Office experience. You can share, backup, and simultaneously edit Microsoft Word, PowerPoint®, and Excel® documents with coworkers.

or how about “with coworkers clients”!!!

It’s only been released today, so I’ve not had chance to play about with it too much but from what I have used so far it was fairly easy to set up and very easy to sync to the cloud. Maybe a simple way to finally rid ourselves of the back and forth drafting process via email attachments!

There is more information on how it works in the video below.

Google Cloud Connect for Microsoft Office (2003/2007/2010)
Share

House of styles

Law firms and house styles.

Anyone in a law firm will probably have a smile on their face reading those words or possibly they will feel a shudder, it’ll all depend on what your job is in the firm.

For those that are new to law firms a short definition may be in order, so to quote Wikipedia:

a set of standards for the writing and design of documents, either for general use or for a specific publication, organisation or field. The implementation of provides uniformity in style and formatting of a document.

I have one wish when it comes to house styles. One style to rule them all!

The wish for there to be one set of styles for all legal documents whatever law firm they’re from. If forced to compromise on that wish, then at least for all law firms to at least sign up to a common set of named styles within Word and an agreement to leave all direct formatting out of documents, so if a lawyer pastes from one document to another it has a matching style in the receiving document.

I’m sure I’ve heard that in Norway there are some legal documents that the state requires in one style only (please correct me in the comments if this is not so), so how about we start in the EU? Or even just England and Wales?

It’s not going to happen though is it?

I know there are plenty of tools out there to help. Two on the market I’m aware of are Microsytems’ DocXtools, Tikit’s House Style Manager and I’m sure there are many others. There are also some great bespoke applications in many firms used to apply styles. But when a document that to-and-fro’s between law firm to client you can end up with a document that has more styles applied to it than pages, unpicking this even with tools takes some skill in Word!

So what’s the answer? Well maybe Word 2010 can help a little.

When you right click to Paste in Word 2010, you get three options (click the image to zoom in).

Paste and keep source formatting

Paste and keep source formatting (left icon). This option keeps the formatting of the original document from where you copied the text.

Paste and merge formatting

Paste and merge formatting (middle icon). This option will merge the formatting and slightly modify the style of the copied content to match the document you are creating.

Paste and keep text only

Paste and keep text only (right icon). And the most useful is saved to the end! This just puts the text into your document and doesn’t bring any of the formatting from the source document!

And another great feature of Word 2010 is the preview, so in each image above I haven’t pasted the text into the document yet. Word is just rendering the new text in place, showing me what it would look like.

Maybe not an end to style woes, but a step towards.

Share

Down to London for a look at “Microsoft 2010”

I spent the day today in London at an event hosted by Trinity Expert Systems. The event focussed on Microsoft’s 2010 stack of products and my reason for attending was to look at Office 2010 and the surrounding technologies (I was particular keen to see what SharePoint 2010 had to offer).

I thought I would blog about a number of other products that caught my eye, not all of them were new, I’d seen some before, but it was the possibilities that came to mind that interested me.

The first session was more on the “infrastructure” products. I use quotes as these were what they traditionally were, but as you’ll see from these two parts of Microsoft’s System Centre, the end user service is becoming more of a focus:

  • SCOM (Microsoft’s monitoring solution). The pictorial view of a systems health from a business service perspective and the possibilities to monitor client machines interested me, it took it beyond what I’ve seen in MOM (it’s predecessor). The possibilities of monitoring the iManage Document Management service end to end, for example. Not just that the physical server is up and running, but that the clients can connect, the IDOL indexer is indexing correctly, the SQL database and application servers are handling transactions nicely, applications load in a satisfactory time etc. For a support team you can see the health of the service as a whole rather than just the servers in it.
  • Service Manager. A new introduction and effectively a help desk system. What I liked here was the self service portal idea, allowing the end user to “do it themselves”. So for example, install an authorised piece of software just by selecting if from the self service portal.

A couple of interesting features of Windows 7 were mentioned that I wasn’t aware of:

  • AppLocker – in my opinion this allows you to lock down desktops in a much better way. Effectively giving a white list of apps you allow on your desktops, the users can install authorised apps themselves. No longer having to manage the crude Windows XP standard user v admin user, which inevitably leads to people having admin right and a proliferation of unwanted apps in the organisation. It also allows quick but controlled authorisation of new apps.
  • BranchCache – basically this is local caching of information. So files from remote locations are downloaded once by the first person and then subsequent requests for the file are from local PC’s rather than from the remote location. I don’t know too many of the technical details but it looks interesting.

Next up was unified communications, I use Office Communicator at work and blogged at the start of the year that I think this is the year for IM in legal. But the integration into Outlook 2010 will need some thinking about. For example, do you need a separate application for communicator? It isn’t necessarily required as it gets integrated into Outlook 2010.

Also something that struck me was whether there was a need for a separate “Person” database (usually found in all firms intranets) diminishes as contact information becomes richer and exposed in many of the 2010 applications (Office, communicator, SharePoint etc)

After lunch it was the turn of SharePoint 2010, this product interests me at the moment. Especially the possibilities for real time collaboration when integrated with Office 2010. The granular way that collaboration works sounds very good, the locking of a paragraph as one party edits it removes the chaos that you got in say Google Wave. Combine this with Office Communicator and real remote collaboration becomes much easier.

I think there is a lot of potential here for Document Management System (DMS) providers to leverage this functionality. Law firms aren’t going to abandon hard core DMS systems anytime soon, but I think there will be use of SharePoint with Office 2010. So there is the real need to control the checkout from a DMS and smoothly transition to SharePoint for collaboration before finally returning that document back into the DMS with version control and audit history (the later isn’t kept by SP2010 when collaborating).

As I start to look at Office 2010 I see more and more possibilities. It’s going to be very hard to scope the delivery of this version of office as it seems to integrate so well with the other Microsoft applications!

Finally at the end of the day we got a quick run through security and Direct Access. This allows seamless access into the business network from your firms laptop wherever internet access can be gained. No more convoluted token/password access! It also ensures that the laptop is covered by all your corporate policies, deployments etc whenever the laptop is connected.

So overall a good day. Plenty learnt about the new technologies from Microsoft. But now, from my point of view, we just have to work out how we avoid getting too carried away with the possibilities for Office 2010!

Share

Breakfast with BigHand

On Thursday myself and a couple of colleagues attended a breakfast briefing from BigHand at Gordons law firm in Leeds, accompanied by plenty of bacon butties from the Roast! It was one of a number of briefings that they are doing throughout the UK on the back of their recent acquisition of nFlow.

As well realising that it’s not just Herbies that have hot meeting rooms, there was information on the nFlow acquisition. But for the most part we were shown demos of some of the new features being planned for future versions of the BigHand software (I think most were for v3.4). Below are some of the key functions that stood out for me (I was making notes on my touch screen Windows Phone whilst trying to keep up with the demos, so if you’re interested in a specific feature I’d double check my understanding with BigHand!)

  • MS Office Integration. This allows a document to be attached to the dictation and passed through the workflow. Also there is the the ability to create and manage profile information to go with the dictation. These combined allow the Fee Earner to provide information to the secretary on the dictation that the system can then use to, for example, launch a template and fill in details such as document name straight from the dictation in the queue.
  • Then combine this with the SDK and you could enable integration into the DMS (Document Management System) to transmit the document in the dictation workflow, yet maintain the security and version control of the DMS.
  • Escalation function. The ability to set global rules in the system to escalate work. So for example a folder could be given a rule that after a certain time all outstanding dictations are moved to another folder (e.g. out of hours team or the team in the firms Asian offices for example).
  • Reporting has been bolstered by the addition of an analytics module. This stores more information than before in the database (no longer limited to last 30 days) and has improved reporting (no longer using Excel). The module allows you to drill down on results obtaining more detail.
  • In the mobility clients for BlackBerry and iPhone you now have the ability to attach documents and photos to dictations. Taking the devices further into general workflow than just pure dictation (e.g. you could dictate meeting notes that referred to notes on a whiteboard that you’d photographed on the phones camera)
  • Finally the speech recognition module. This was brought in with v3.3 but it’s worth a mention again as it still impresses me. It’s way beyond the old desktop versions, but the addition in the newer version is the ability to chose to either send the transcribed document back to yourself for proofing or send it onto your default workflow for proofing. So the “training” can be done by a secretary checking and correcting your document.

The briefings are still being run, details can be found on their site.

Share

No, no, no! Who asked for that?

I was reading an article yesterday, from an interview with Steve Balmer. It was about Microsoft’s direction and its competitors (in particular FireFox, Google and Linux). One comment stood out:

Yeah, we’re right now about 74 percent overall with the browser market, roughly speaking. But we’re having to compete like heck with IE 8, with great new features.

This to me showed how “off the ball” Microsoft are!

Now before I go on let me say the following. I hate seeing Micro$oft. I am not an Apple or Linux fanboy, in fact I would go as far to say I really don’t care of MacOS that much. Yes I really like the iPhone interface, but would never buy one thanks to having to have iTunes to activate the thing. So I use a Windows Mobile device. I’ve used Ubuntu and think it’s alright, but actually I honestly prefer Windows. I love the xbox. So I’m not Microsoft bashing here.

There now I’ve said that, back to the quote. In particular this sentence “But we’re having to compete like heck with IE 8, with great new features.”

My response as per the title, no, no, no, who asked for that? I don’t want more features, in fact I want less. I want my browser to be small and very fast and just let me browse. If IE8 had come out and was barebones fast as you like, I would probably have switched back from FireFox!

This got me thinking about lawyers and legal software and the same applies. Just give them the features they require. Make the next release of the Document Management System, the CRM system, the finance system, the template management system, the digital dictation system leaner.

Take Word or any Word Processor. How much functionality does the average lawyer need? Most law firms will also have multiple add ins to provide more functionality. The integration with the add ins should be slicker and removing of the unnecessary proprietary options easier.

Most people want to get on with the task in hand, the software should help that both quickly and easily. So with the browser, it should help me browse, end of! The DMS should help be file and retrieve my documents. Outlook should let me manage my email. etc etc 

So no more new features please unless it’s going to make the task I’m using the software for easier and faster!

Share

Microsoft fights back

It might not be with products that directly relate to law firms, but Microsoft does seem to be positioning itself for a fight back against Google and Apple. There have been three stories in the last few weeks that I think point to this:

  1. Announcement of Google Chrome OS. Now this one is an odd one to point out as on the face of it it seems to be a Google pulling away story. But it’s been the subsequent “what ifs” that caught my eye. Particularly the ones like this “Free Windows 7 Internet Edition To Tackle Google Chrome OS?“. If Microsoft offer Windows 7 free, even for a limited period, they could and probably would get such a foothold in netbooks as to kill Chrome before it launches.
  2. Microsoft is to launch a music streaming service. If they can get this right then this may be the service to seriously challenge iTunes. A Spotify type service allowing free music streaming supported by adverts. If integrated into the xbox would put it right in the centre of home entertainment and if they could somehow hook it into the Zune then finally the iPod may get competition (one off cost for a Zune and then free music!)
  3. Finally the announcement of a free online version of Office! A real challenge to Google Docs. Yes, Google may have the head start but Microsoft have the trusted brand here, Microsoft Office. I mean wouldn’t you rather use Word? This last one may be of interest to law firms!

Microsoft are starting to join the “Free” business model in the consumer market and could really start to fight back in the battle against Apple and Google. I think this is a good thing, competition makes better products and if Microsoft really can bring ideas from the excellent xbox division into their business offerings we may get some real improvements in usability over endless extra functionality.

From a law firm perspective it will be interesting how the development of the web based Office goes and how the consumer model of a “cloud” for all my documents and emails evolves in the business environment.

After all if I’ve unlimited email capacity with no performance drop off (e.g. GMail/Hotmail) and access to my documents and word processor anywhere (e.g. Google Docs/Office online) at home, will I accept the storage constraints and performance constraints of the desktop products at work?

Share

Where will the law firm IT department be a year from now? – part 2

The legal core technologies (DMS, CRM etc) – where next?

So what about those core technologies (the key IT systems)? Well most law firms now cannot function without IT (who could have said that even 10 years ago!). email, the DMS and the global finance applications are now ingrained in most law firms as not just core, but key technologies.

Take a look at Legal Technology Insiders list of software used by the UK top 250 and you’ll see that all firms pretty much use a common set of key technologies. But mention web 2.0 (or whatever you like to call it) and my guess is there will be very few firms who have this type of software as a key system. Is this because it is considered a technology fad or is it inappropriate for corporate use? I don’t think either is true, in fact I suspect that there are a number of firms are already using Wikis, blogs etc in small niche areas.

I think law firms though are like any other firm, find embracing these technologies is difficult. To implement them you almost need to just put them out there and let people use them how they want to (which is why facebook, twitter, you tube etc have succeeded, no one told people how they should use them). This method of implementing new software I think is alien to most firms period, it’ll take time to change attitudes, procedures etc<

But we need to start to expect people to be IT savvy, just as we expect to have people employed that can read and write. Being proud of “not understanding computers” is no longer an option! I think firms with these type of people will start to push web 2.0 products in 2009.

What about MS Office?

This is probably the one piece of software that is on 100% of all legal desktops. And I suspect almost everyone has Office 2003, some brave soles may have jumped to 2007 but I bet the percentage is very small. The big question though is, will people ever move to Office 2007 or Office 14? I starting to think that not many will, do you really want any more functionality out of office? Office 2003 does the job, so unless Microsoft force you to do it through some licencing or support agreement there is little incentive to move.

However the one thing that could change this is if the desktop footprint in Office 14 gets much smaller and the application gets much much quicker, then we may see people switch in vast number! This is not as far fetched as it sounds, from performance results of the leaked Windows 7 beta it may be that MS now get this is a key issue!

Mobility

Honestly I don’t think law firms are ready to embrace the “80% office space”. Letting staff  hot desk their staff, saving on the usual daily empty 20% of desks. Sure BlackBerrys will thrive, remote desktop access or web based access will see more take up and messaging (Office Communication Server) will take off, but only if these were implemented in 2008 or before. I can’t see anyone getting budgets for doing initiatives like this from scratch in 2009.

Summary

So in summary I think most legal IT depts will still be around in a guise that we will identify as being roughly as they are now. I think in the current climate they will have been trimmed through cost cutting, but on the whole it won’t be fully outsourced. The IT dept of January 2010 will probably be smaller and it will probably have spent less in 2009 than in previous years. I think there may be a move in 2009 to some small scale outsourcing of specific functions taken up by a fair few firms, but which part and how much will depend on the firm. I also think there will be a firm in 2009 that will go for a large scale attempt at cost saving and outsource the lot, but personally I bet they will relive the last recessions outsourcing blunders and fail.

Overall though I think most depts will take a real look at how to make what they’ve got work more effectively. As well as looking to improve performance, reliability of the current services (the key issue I bet almost all firms will tackle!) I think there will be a switch from constantly upgrading and implementing the core technologies (DMS, CRM, Office etc) to more web 2.0 applications, either social type sites or mashups of their main systems.

Share